
Due process requires the court to give lawyers adequate notice of and time to prepare for a suspension hearing. The Court of Appeals agreed with Williams’ position that his due process rights were violated, after an impromptu suspension hearing went forward immediately following a highly contested jury trial without the opportunity to review court transcripts of any alleged misconduct.
In issuing its decision the Court noted that “Williams…was entitled [to due process which requires] a properly noticed hearing regarding his conduct and whatever sanction might be appropriate, and…time to time to prepare for that hearing.” Accordingly, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for a new hearing.
For more detail, read the full court decision here: /wp-content/uploads/sites/4796/2016/11/166AP364.pdf